Topic 4 of 7 · Statements 41–55

Entanglement and quantum information

Schmidt decomposition, entropy inequalities, monotones under channels and the structure of entanglement.

41

Schmidt decomposition

Every bipartite pure state has orthonormal local bases in which it is a single sum, from the singular value decomposition of its coefficient matrix.

Entanglement ↗
42

Schmidt rank criterion

Entangled pure states have Schmidt rank at least 2.

Entanglement ↗
43

Reduced-state spectra

Both reduced states have eigenvalues $\lambda_i$, the squared Schmidt coefficients.

Entanglement ↗
44

Pure-state entanglement entropy

The standard entanglement measure for pure bipartite states; zero iff separable, maximal $\log d$.

Entanglement ↗
45

Entropy subadditivity

Joint uncertainty cannot exceed the sum of parts; equality holds for product states.

Entanglement ↗
46

Araki-Lieb inequality

Unlike classical entropy, a joint quantum entropy can be smaller than a part's, which signals entanglement.

Entanglement ↗
47

Strong subadditivity

Deep Lieb-Ruskai theorem, equivalent to many other entropy inequalities; it underpins nearly all of quantum information theory.

Entanglement ↗
48

Quantum mutual information

Total correlations, classical plus quantum.

Entanglement ↗
49

Conditional mutual information

Equivalent to strong subadditivity: given $B$, learning $C$ cannot lower correlations with $A$ below zero.

Entanglement ↗
50

Data-processing inequality

Applying a channel can only make states less distinguishable.

Entanglement ↗
51

Trace-distance contractivity

Noise cannot increase the optimal single-shot distinguishability of two states.

Entanglement ↗
52

Fidelity monotonicity

Uhlmann fidelity, $F=\lVert\sqrt\rho\sqrt\sigma\rVert_1$, can only increase under channels.

Entanglement ↗
53

Relative entropy positivity

Klein's inequality; zero iff $\rho=\sigma$.

Entanglement ↗
54

Positive partial transpose

Peres-Horodecki criterion: negative partial transpose proves entanglement.

Entanglement ↗
55

Entanglement monogamy

Coffman-Kundu-Wootters inequality for three qubits: strong entanglement with one party limits entanglement with others.

Entanglement ↗

Search the statements

Search titles and topics. Press / to open. Esc to close.

◈ QuantumVerse Hub